What I do

I take ambiguous problems in clinical, life sciences, and operational settings and turn them into specifications, shipped products, and measurable outcomes. I put AI into regulated workflows, from validation protocols and monitoring to build-vs-buy decisions. I work across ML, engineering, clinical, commercial, and investor teams, translating between their perspectives.

I was part of the founding team at 01Health, a Balderton-backed company building a marketplace that lets clinicians deliver specialist dental care to patients everywhere. From seed to Series A, I built much of the operational infrastructure that enabled the company to scale. I hired across clinical, technical, and operational teams, defined their processes, and established the data analytics and customer support functions, automating parts of the latter. I worked with medical device manufacturers to establish manufacturing processes, quality assurance systems, and regulatory compliance procedures.

I built the digital treatment tool that brought us in line with competitors and enabled our US expansion. I also built the clinical team that quadrupled the revenue and volume of one of our smaller product lines.

Before that, at GlaxoSmithKline, I built systems on top of complex global enterprise platforms spanning drug discovery, manufacturing, and sales and distribution across more than 12 countries.

Why I do it

Working on clinical and operational systems taught me what separates good ones from bad. Good systems take care of the routine so people can spend their judgement and attention where it matters. Bad ones make people work for the system. I now ask the same question about life more broadly.

Engineering, art, business, food, travel. They all circle the same questions: how do we build, contribute to, and live a good life? How much should we borrow from the past, and how much should we imagine the future?

I'm interested in the role technology can play here. Not by making life more predictable or optimising every moment towards a predefined outcome, but by helping us navigate complexity, develop our capabilities, and encounter more of what life has to offer. Technology can create stability without rigidity. It can help us manage our resources, cultivate relationships, develop skills and explore unfamiliar places. But usefulness alone isn't enough. If technology shapes how we spend our time and relate to one another, we should ask whether it makes us more attentive, more capable, more connected, or simply gives us more to manage.

The best systems might be those that eventually recede into the background. They give us enough stability to stop worrying about stability, and enough freedom to follow our curiosity. We can't engineer a good life by predicting its shape, but we can build the conditions that make one more possible: presence, competence, relationships, and tools that leave us more open to beauty, connection, discovery and change.

I don't think anyone needs a framework for living. If you're learning, you're living. But a little engineering goes a long way.

Now: I'm looking for my next 5–10 year project. If you're working on something that you think really adds to life, I'd like to hear about it.

Technical

React, TypeScript, Three.js, WebGL, API integrations, SQL, MLOps, agentic workflows, analytics dashboards, SAP, cloud infrastructure

Education

• University of Warwick — First Class Honours, Mechanical Engineering
• Warwick Business School — Business Management
• Warwick Manufacturing Group — Research: human-centred design and technology-driven behaviour change

Beyond work

• Engineers Without Borders — former project lead, sustainable power infrastructure in rural Tanzania.
• Save the Children — volunteer.
• Sitopia Farm.